David Hundeyin is trending after the investigative journalist publicly called out People’s Gazette, accusing the news outlet of trying to exclude him from his own investigative story. He criticized the outlet for being complicit in safeguarding vested interests and aligning itself with Tinubu and foreign influences.
Hundeyin’s bold accusations and strong words have stirred conversations across various platforms, but what exactly happened? David Hundeyin, known for his investigative work and his relentless pursuit of the truth, has never shied away from confronting powerful figures.
Recently, he turned his focus on the People’s Gazette after the outlet made a controversial claim about Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The Gazette suggested that Tinubu had paid over N3 billion to a U.S. public relations firm in a bid to repair his image, particularly after a narcotics-related case that was dismissed by Nigeria’s Supreme Court.
Hundeyin, however, wasn’t just interested in the story itself; he was upset about how People’s Gazette handled it. According to him, the outlet had tried to exclude him from his investigative work. He accused the Gazette of being complicit in covering up the truth, aligning itself with political interests, and protecting the powers that be namely, Tinubu and the foreign entities involved.
In his now-viral tweet, Hundeyin expressed his anger at the situation, calling out the People’s Gazette for trying to rewrite the narrative and take credit for his story. He didn’t hold back, delivering a fierce message on his X (Twitter) page:
“I’m calling out @GazetteNGR publicly because you don’t sit in your air-conditioned, NGO-funded office in Utako and watch while I get hunted around the world because of a story I wrote, only for you to actually imagine that you have the ability to even attempt to write me out of my own story.”
Hundeyin was clear in his frustration, suggesting that the people at the Gazette were comfortable in their cushy office, enjoying the support of powerful political figures, while he was out in the field doing the real investigative work. He wasn’t just speaking up for himself, but for anyone who’s ever been sidelined or overshadowed by larger, more influential forces.
David Hundeyin Clashes and the Backlash
Hundeyin’s tweet didn’t go unnoticed. The public outcry and responses from his followers were swift and intense. One Twitter user, @itspauldaniels, replied to Hundeyin’s tweet, echoing his frustration. Paul Daniels criticized the Gazette for allegedly sitting comfortably in air-conditioned rooms, funded by corrupt politicians while taking credit for work that didn’t belong to them.
Another user, @AndinoAsuquo, also came to Hundeyin’s defence, highlighting how the Gazette and similar outlets are often “tools” in the hands of politicians, serving their interests instead of pursuing the truth.
In yet another tweet, @AndinoAsuquo added: “Don’t talk when brave men are talking. Imagine the audacity? On top the matter they didn’t take any action or any kind of commitment towards the issue.”
This comment wasn’t just an attack on the Gazette, but also a critique of the way certain media outlets fail to take a strong stance on important issues, especially when they are being influenced by political power. According to these responses, the Gazette was not only guilty of trying to steal credit for someone else’s work but they were also accused of being complicit in the political games of the rich and powerful.
Among the many supporters of David Hundeyin was @QUEENOFDBLUES1, who expressed their strong loyalty to Hundeyin’s stance, saying: “Not on your watch, they’ll write you out of your story. No gree for anybody.” This reply captures the sentiment of many of Hundeyin’s supporters, who believe that his voice and work should not be undermined or erased by larger powers.
The clash between David Hundeyin and People’s Gazette is more than just a disagreement between two figures in the media industry. It highlights a bigger issue facing journalism in Nigeria and the world at large. In a time when political influence and corporate interests often shape the news, it’s easy for independent voices like Hundeyin’s to be sidelined or misrepresented.
This dispute also sheds light on the role of social media in modern journalism. Platforms like X, and others have become a space for public discourse, where public figures and media personalities can directly engage with the public. Hundeyin’s decision to use his X account to call out People’s Gazette is a reflection of the new age of journalism, one where transparency, accountability, and direct interaction with the audience have become key elements.
As more Nigerians follow this unfolding drama, it’s important to reflect on the state of journalism in the country. Are media outlets truly working for the people, or are they simply pawns in a much larger game? As the conversation continues to unfold, one thing is clear, David Hundeyin is not backing down, and the battle for the truth is far from over.
